- The Creator Lens
- Posts
- 📢 Hollywood Rallies Against AI Copyright Grab, 🖼️ AI-Generated Art Is Not Allowed Copyright & 🛡️ OpenAI's "License to Steal" Proposal Sparks Outrage
📢 Hollywood Rallies Against AI Copyright Grab, 🖼️ AI-Generated Art Is Not Allowed Copyright & 🛡️ OpenAI's "License to Steal" Proposal Sparks Outrage
Hollywood’s top creatives are taking a stand against AI’s unchecked use of copyrighted content, sparking a fierce debate over artistic integrity. In this issue, we dive into the battle over AI copyright rights, OpenAI’s controversial proposal to relax these rules, and a landmark court ruling that redefines ownership in the age of machine-made art.
VISUAL CREATORS
For your artistic side.

The Story: More than 400 Hollywood creatives, including big names like Guillermo del Toro and Paul McCartney, have come together to sign an open letter urging the Trump administration to strengthen copyright protections against AI firms. This letter opposes recent proposals from tech giants like OpenAI and Google, advocating the use of copyrighted material for AI training without permissions or compensation.
The Details:
The open letter highlights the significant economic contributions of the arts and entertainment sector, supporting over 2.3 million jobs and generating $229 billion in wages annually.
Signatories indicate that easing copyright restrictions for AI use threatens not just Hollywood but also America's broader knowledge economy, where creators across sectors rely heavily on intellectual property protections.
The letter criticizes AI companies for seeking special exemptions, arguing they should negotiate licensing agreements like other industries, rather than exploiting artists’ works without due compensation.
Notable figures from all corners of entertainment—like Ben Stiller and Cate Blanchett—have rallied to reaffirm the value of artists and push back against potential legal weakening of copyright protections against AI technologies.
The debate reflects growing tensions between the entertainment industry and tech firms, as the latter call for broader access to intellectual property to maintain a competitive edge in AI.
Why It Matters: This open letter is a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle between creativity and technology. The entertainment industry is not just defending its artists; it’s safeguarding the cultural fabric of the nation. Without strong copyright protections, the very foundation of artistic innovation may crumble, leading to a future where creators are unable to monetize their works in an increasingly AI-dominated landscape. As industry leaders band together, their message underscores the critical importance of intellectual property rights to the livelihood of countless artists, filmmakers, and musicians.
PRODUCTION MASTERY
The commercial aspects of creativity.

The Story: A federal appeals court has ruled that artwork generated entirely by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, emphasizing that human authorship is a non-negotiable requirement for copyright protection. The unanimous ruling stemmed from the case of computer scientist Stephen Thaler, who sought copyright for an image created by his AI, the “Creativity Machine.”
The Details:
The court reaffirmed a previous decision by the U.S. Copyright Office denying Thaler's application, stating that all eligible work must involve initial human authorship.
Judge Patricia Millett noted that the ruling maintains the traditional understanding of copyright law — that machines cannot qualify as authors under the current statute.
While the Copyright Office allows for human-authored creations that involve AI, it draws a clear line: works must be credited to a human, not merely the AI tool that assisted in the creation.
The ruling cited concerns over how copyright law would function if machines were given authorship, as they lack life, nationality, and the capability to transfer ownership.
Thaler’s attorney indicated intentions to appeal the ruling, arguing for the need to address the challenges posed by rapid advances in AI technology.

A Recent Entrance to Paradise by Stephen Thaler’s Creativity Machine system
Why It Matters: This ruling sends a strong message to creators relying on AI tools: without direct human involvement, your work cannot be protected by copyright. The implications reverberate through the creative industry, where many artists experiment with AI technologies. As AI continues to evolve and play a larger role in creative processes, it will be critical for lawmakers to address these legal gaps to protect the rights of creators while adapting to technological advancements. Understanding the legal landscape now could save future headaches as AI becomes an even more integral part of the creative workflow.
TOGETHER WITH AUTHORY
The portfolio that's automatically up to date with your work.
Authory saves you hours with a portfolio that's always up to date.
Get backups of all your articles.
Be ready to impress potential clients and employers, anytime.
CREATOR ECONOMY
Navigating the digital creative world.

The Story: A coalition of newspapers, led by Alden Global Capital's publications, has sharply criticized OpenAI's recent proposal to the Trump administration that seeks looser copyright laws to facilitate AI model training on copyrighted content. They accuse the tech giants of trying to obtain a "license to steal" and argue this undermines the hard work of journalists and creators.
The Details:
The Boston Herald and Chicago Tribune published a scathing editorial condemning OpenAI’s and Google’s proposals for looser copyright restrictions, claiming they want a "license to steal" from creators.
OpenAI argues allowing access to copyrighted materials is essential for maintaining U.S. AI leadership against China, citing national security concerns in their plea to the Trump administration.
The editorial also condemns the framing of the copyright debate as a national security issue, sarcastically stating that OpenAI's position is more about "outright theft".
Major celebrities, including over 400 figures from Hollywood, have voiced their opposition to the proposals, emphasizing the need for protecting creative industries from being exploited by AI companies.
Why It Matters: This controversial push by OpenAI could fundamentally reshape copyright laws and impact the livelihoods of creators across various fields. As tensions rise between tech giants and creative professionals, the outcome could set a precedent for how AI development intersects with intellectual property rights. For creative professionals grappling with the implications of AI, this ongoing debate underscores the necessity for robust protections to ensure that their work is respected and compensated fairly. The outcome could determine whether the future of AI ingenuity respects, or disregards, the creative foundation it stems from.
📫 Sign up for The Creator Lens
🔥 Press Worthy

📽️ VISUAL CREATORS
Moonvalley has launched Marey, an AI video generator aimed at the film industry, creating high-definition content using only licensed footage. Already in testing with major studios, Marey promises faster production times and new opportunities for creative storytelling without copyright headaches.
Google's Gemini Flash 2.0 is stirring up discussions as it proves adept at removing watermarks from images, currently in its experimental phase. While this capability raises eyebrows, it's meant to reinforce responsible use. Notably, modified images still retain a Google watermark, sparking debate on originality vs. innovation.
📈 PRODUCTION MASTERY
A Chinese court has ruled that AI-generated images can receive copyright protection, citing the creator's human input as essential. The case involved an image made by Midjourney, underscoring a legal foundation for combining AI with creative effort.
Pouya Shahbazian, producer of the Divergent franchise, has launched Staircase Studios AI, aiming to craft near-studio-quality films for under $500K. Their debut, The Woman With Red Hair, showcases AI-driven production. Can it thrill audiences or will viewers remain skeptical?
🎭 CREATOR ECONOMY
India's government is fueling its creator economy with a $1 billion investment aimed at empowering local video producers. Announced at the WAVES summit, this fund will enhance creators' tech and production capabilities, unlocking global market opportunities. With over four million influencers, India's booming scene, especially in YouTube Shorts, is set for exponential growth.
Pinterest recently updated its privacy policy to allow the use of user data and images for AI training without regard to when content was posted. The site emphasizes its opt-out option but faces backlash as users express frustration over AI-generated clutter overtaking authentic pins.
TOGETHER WITH ADQUICK
Run ads IRL with AdQuick
With AdQuick, you can now easily plan, deploy and measure campaigns just as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.
You can learn more at www.AdQuick.com
📫 Sign up for The Creator Lens
📚 Learn & Grow

Hanan Maamoun
📽️ VISUAL CREATORS
Photographer Breaks the Rules With Mind-Bending Cubist Art
Trump’s DEI Attacks Are Creating Real-Time Destruction for Filmmakers of Color
📈 PRODUCTION MASTERY
Andor creator refuses to publish scripts because of AI
LinkedIn Shares Top Skills on the Rise Based on Job and Profile Listings
🎭 CREATOR ECONOMY
Two Men Found Guilty in Theft of $6 Million Gold Toilet
ADHD is a popular self-diagnosis on TikTok, but mental health patients don’t always prioritize accuracy
Reply