In partnership with

VISUAL CREATORS
For your artistic side.

👩‍⚖️ Can AI Survive Without Artists?

The Story: The growing prevalence of AI-generated art poses a significant threat to human artists and raises pressing concerns about copyright infringement and the ethics of artistic creation. As AI models rely on extensive datasets, often sourced from real artists’ work without consent, the debate intensifies over whether artists should be asked for permission before their work is used in AI training.

The Details:

• Former Meta executive Nick Clegg argues that requiring explicit permission from artists before using their work in AI training is unrealistic, cautioning it could dismantle the UK AI industry.

• The current landscape sees major AI companies asserting that they cannot innovate without broad access to diverse artistic data, leading to potential competition issues if regulations vary by country.

• A growing number of creators advocate for stricter copyright protections, arguing that the present lack of consent undermines their economic livelihood and devalues genuine artistic contributions.

• Installations of clearer consent frameworks could strike a balance between artistic integrity and technological advancement, potentially benefitting the creative economy.

• Legal experts suggest that international agreements on licensing could protect creators while allowing AI innovation to flourish, but practical implementation remains complex.

Why It Matters: The stakes are high as the clash between AI innovation and artist rights unfolds. Creatives must advocate for regulations that protect their intellectual property, ensuring they are compensated for their artistry that fuels AI models. Balancing the demands of the burgeoning AI industry with fair compensation and rights for artists is essential, as it could define the future of creativity and innovation in the digital landscape. Ignoring these concerns may lead to a homogenized creative ecosystem where authentic voices are overshadowed by mass-produced AI content, ultimately jeopardizing the essence of artistic expression.

PRODUCTION MASTERY
The commercial aspects of creativity.

🎬 Disney & Universal Battle Midjourney in Court

The Story: Disney and Universal are taking a stand against generative AI, filing a landmark lawsuit against Midjourney, an AI image generator, for copyright infringement. The companies allege that Midjourney reproduces numerous iconic characters without permission, calling it a "bottomless pit of plagiarism."

The Details:

• The 110-page lawsuit claims Midjourney's technology incorporates and copies famous characters like Darth Vader and Elsa, leveraging them to generate unauthorized images and videos.

• Disney and Universal argue that Midjourney has ignored multiple cease and desist letters demanding it stop infringing on their copyrights.

• This case marks the first major legal confrontation between Hollywood studios and an AI firm, setting potential precedents for the use of AI in creative industries.

• Midjourney, having tripled its revenue from $50 million to $300 million in just one year, poses a significant threat to traditional IP protections.

• The lawsuit highlights the broader implications for creators and the need for AI companies to adopt stringent copyright protections as they leverage existing work for their technology.

Why It Matters: The outcome of this lawsuit could reshape the conversation around copyright in the age of AI. For creative professionals—be it photographers, filmmakers, or artists—the case raises critical questions about the ownership and usage of intellectual property. As Disney and Universal push back against perceived infringements, it's a crucial reminder for all creators about the importance of protecting their work in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, highlighting the fine line between innovation and infringement. This battle could catalyze a wave of scrutiny across the industry, impacting how AI tools operate and are utilized by creatives.

CREATOR ECONOMY
Navigating the digital creative world.

🎨 Why Good Taste Matters More with AI

The Story: In an age of limitless AI-generated content, the ability to discern quality and appropriateness is becoming the most valuable skill. Leaders need to cultivate their taste—the instinct that tells us not just what can be done, but what should be done. As AI takes over more creative tasks, this human talent will set individuals apart in a sea of choices.

The Details:

• Competitors in various fields face an overwhelming influx of AI-generated options, with AI capable of producing countless variations of art, writing, and strategies.

• While AI excels at remixing styles, it fundamentally lacks the human touch of taste, which embodies cultural intuition and emotional understanding.

• Taste serves not just as an aesthetic measure but also an ethical compass, guiding decisions and enabling leaders to prevent the amplification of biases present in AI outputs.

• Cultivating taste involves exposure to high-quality work, critical analysis of personal preferences, and active curation of what resonates, allowing individuals to refine their judgment.

• The benefit of taste lies in its ability to distinguish originality and emotional depth—a factor that AI cannot replicate.

Why It Matters: The challenge and opportunity presented by the proliferation of AI-generated choices signify a transformative moment for the creative industry. As machines automate more processes, the skill to curate and elevate meaningful content becomes critical. Good taste is essential not only for leaders trying to make impactful decisions but for everyone as they navigate the evolving landscape. With its moral dimension, taste is not merely about aesthetics; it helps ensure that creative outcomes respect context and avoid ethical pitfalls.

🔥 Press Worthy

📽️ VISUAL CREATORS

TikTok creators are blurring lines by pretending their real videos are AI-generated. Musicians like GameBoi Pat leverage the trend to boost views, with the gimmick providing a competitive edge. Amid AI fears, this playful deception keeps creators relevant and engaged in the algorithm.

Mr. Bingo, the London-based illustrator, encourages creativity without limits, stating that social media shouldn’t deter emerging artists. With a cult following, he thrives on fan interaction, using their ideas in his work. He emphasizes that there's always space for fresh voices in the ever-evolving creative landscape.

📈 PRODUCTION MASTERY

SAG-AFTRA may soon end its video game actors' strike after reaching a tentative deal with major game companies. The agreement promises A.I. guardrails protecting performers, marking a significant victory after months of negotiations amid industry demands for fair compensation.

Getty Images and Stability AI kicked off a landmark court battle in London, with Getty accusing Stability of massively infringing on its copyrighted photos. The trial, expected to last three weeks, could reshape the relationship between creators and AI, as threats of industry-wide implications loom large.

🎭 CREATOR ECONOMY

The music industry faces a generational shift, with "nepo babies" like Elliot Grainge and Val Blavatnik stepping into key roles. As major labels adapt to evolving trends and the AI landscape, whispers of successors emerge, questioning if they'll finally break the old guard's grip.

Influencers Alyssa Sheil and Sydney Nicole Gifford are set to dismiss their lawsuit over aesthetic imitation. Gifford sought damages for distress, while Sheil defends against intimidation. As Gifford walks away, the case raises questions about owning aesthetics in the creator economy.

📚 Learn & Grow

📽️ VISUAL CREATORS

• Conversations with the Creators Shaping the world of Digital Art

• A Studio Visit With One Of New York’s Most Influential Downtown Artists

📈 PRODUCTION MASTERY

• Nintendo’s Switch 2 is the fastest-selling game console of all time

• Paramount Global Is Laying Off Another 3.5% Of Its US Workforce

🎭 CREATOR ECONOMY

• How Much Energy Does Our Body Expend In Thinking?

• How Fonts Can Hurt Cultures